Focke Wulf with BMW 802 engines- model kit development

Initially I was under the assumption that this design was entirely based on the FW 190 fuselage. So in essence a standard 190 modified to accommodate the big BMW 802 engine. This assumption was also supported by some statements from literature, see below (source unknown). 


However, if that assumption was indeed correct, the depicted shape of the fuselage must be somewhat inaccurate. The fuselage seems oddly short and the shape of the VTP differs quite significantly from the 190. The design was initially derived by Dipl-Ing Ludwig Mittelhuber, as stated by luft46.com (no source given). Mittelhuber was seemingly involved in numerous FW projects (TW 200, Ta 154 etc.). 

Source Material (primary)

So more sources were needed. After additional investigation, I found this drawing of a Focke Wulf with the BMW 802. Size 14 cm x 10 cm. Most likely discover by Heinz Norwarra, as the backside indicates. 

H. Norwarra states the following in his book (Die Deutsche Luftrüstung 1933-1945), we're the same image is shown:


Weiterentwicklung FW 190 D mit 18-Zylinder BMW 802 Startleistung 2450 PS. Propellerhaube vorn offen für Kühlluftzuführung. Bewaffnung 4 MK, zwei über Motor, zwei in Flügelwurzel. Spannweite 13,00 m, Länge 11,15 m. 


Engl.


 Further development FW 190 D with 18-cylinder BMW 802 starting power 2450 hp. Propeller hood open at the front for cooling air supply. Armament 4 MK, two over engine, two in wing root. Span 13.00 m, length 11.15 m.


Strangely enough, it is described by Norwarra as a development of the FW 190 D. Nothing seems to support that statement at this point. According to Gunston ((2006). World Encyclopedia of Aero Engines: From the Pioneers to the Present Day (5th ed.). Stroud, UK: Sutton. ISBN 0-7509-4479-X) the BMW 802 development was discontinued in 1942, the same year the first D-0 was completed. The armament is visible on the drawing, but placing 2 MKs (108?) above the motor seems to be an odd choice due to the cramped space available. luft46.com claims no armament at all. I personally believe two MG 131 to be more likely, plus MK 108s in the wings. 


Furthermore, in 'Flugzeug Classic 2/2005' a gentleman called Horst Lob (Bremen) published the following image, in the section ' letter to the editor'. 


Apart from the image, the gentleman could not provide further information apart from some speculation. The image was titled 'Entwurf with BMW 8011' But, this is indeed the first 3- view drawing of that FW with the infamous BMW 8011.


As for the BMW 8011, I found the following statement on the forum https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/:


From BMW Aero Engines by Jakobs, Kroschel, and Piere... "33 projects codenamed P 8000 to P 8032 are documented for the period up to April 1942 alone. All of them were either based on the BMW 801 (13 projects) or on the 802 (20 projects). For the most part, the main focus of the documented projects was on internal and external engine aerodynamics, looking for example at charge-air and cooling air feed, or at a double spinner with or without an inlet cone."


This seems to support the assumption that the BWM P.8011 was a sub-version of the 802 (or 801?). Information about that engine was at some point forwarded to BMW which integrated it into their design. As an example, P.8008 is depicted below. Wikipedia suggests two turbochargers for the P.8011. I do not have access to any source supporting that statement. P.8011 might as well featured 3 turbo chargers as P.8008.

From BMW Aero Engines by Jakobs, Kroschel, and Piere... "33 projects codenamed P 8000 to P 8032 are documented for the period up to April 1942 alone. All of them were either based on the BMW 801 (13 projects) or on the 802 (20 projects). For the most part, the main focus of the documented projects was on internal and external engine aerodynamics, looking for example at charge-air and cooling air feed, or at a double spinner with or without an inlet cone."
This seems to support the assumption that the BWM P.8011 was a sub-version of the 802 (or 801?). Information about that engine was at some point forwarded to BMW which integrated it into their design. As an example, P.8008 is depicted below. Wikipedia suggests two turbochargers for the P.8011. I do not have access to any source supporting that statement. P.8011 might as well featured 3 turbo chargers as P.8008.

The wing of the Mittelhuber fighter also differs significantly from the FW 190 wing, see below (compared here to FW 190 D-9 wing). The sweep angle of the leading edge is smaller, the wing tip pointier. Wing span is 13.00 m compared to 10.51 m for the D-9. 

Overall. I have to assume, that Mittelhuber's design is A) not closely based on the 190 after all. And B), FW/ Mittelhuber would sporadically update the design with input from BMW, that was working on numerous sub- versions for the BMW 802. So at this point it can also be concluded that this aircraft was not a sub- variant of the FW 190. 

The model kit (1/48 and 1/72) is available here: LINK


Description of the Junkers EF 110 kit development by my3dbase.
von noreply 07 Apr., 2024
Description of the Junkers EF 110 kit development by my3dbase.
von Kristian Zimmermann 24 Jan., 2024
Bubble Canopy Do 435- fictional
von noreply 18 Aug., 2023
ARADO E.395 model kit development
von noreply 11 Feb., 2023
The EMW A-6 looks definitely cool enough to justify making a model kit for it. And as far as I know, there is no 1:48 scale model kit on the market currently. Some information from the www.nevingtonwarmuseum.com:
von Kristian Zimmermann 10 Okt., 2020
Damit Eure Kekse mit unseren Backförmchen so richtig gut funktionieren haben wir für euch ein paar Tips zusammengestellt. Vorab einmal das Rezept: 100 g Butter 50 g Puderzucker (kann dem eigenen Geschmack angepasst werden) 30 g Ei 200 g Mehl Die Mengen können unter Einhaltung des Mischungsverhältnisses erhöht werden. Zunächst wird der Puderzucker mit der Butter vermengt. Danach wir das Ei hinzugegeben. Anschließend wird das Mehl untergehoben. Wichtig: Damit der Teig die richtige Konsistenz erhält sollte er gekühlt werden; ca 30min im Gefrierfach oder 1-2 Stunden im Kühlschrank.
von Kristian Zimmermann 07 Feb., 2020
The PATHFINDER is essentially based on the standard NG-2. But it features a full auto mechanism, voltage indicator and safety catch. Max fps is 130, the rate of fire is approximately 900darts/min.
von Kristian Zimmermann 07 Feb., 2020
For this blaster we had to iterate ourselves through 17 different versions. Most deisgn solutions implemented on half- or full length darts where not applikable due to the different type of ammunition. Lets quickly dive into the main design drivers of this blaster.
von Kristian Zimmermann 05 Feb., 2020
The NG-2 GOBLIN was designed in 2019 and basically follows the design philosophy of the original NG-1. But, as always, you learn. So the NG-2 was an effort to reduce the overall complexity of a blaster while optimizing it for easy printing and quick assembly. After all, 3Dprinting is rather scalable by simply investing in new machines. However, post processing, assembly, testing and shipping quickly become bottlenecks in production.
von Kristian Zimmermann 05 Feb., 2020
We use 3D printers to produce our products. There are different types of printers and countless different processes. We have specialized in what is sometimes revered to as FFF (fuse filament fabrication). The process is rather cost effective and uses a simple process of depositing a thermoplastic material layer by layer. 3D printing technology used to be locked down by patents for decades, limiting the technology to large and costly machines. Once those patents ran out, a new generation of desktop printers started to emerge. These machines are rather simple in design, but manage to output parts with astounding quality. Also, due to the small investment costs, the process can now be parallelized which has a profund influence on production costs. At the core of all this, is the material. After all, it is the material in combination with a specific design that enables a desired functionality. And today, in 2020, PLA or 'polylactic acid' is one of the most widespread materials in desktop 3D printing. PLA outperforms almost any other material in this category in terms of strength and stiffness (yes, those are two different things ;)). An interesting comparison is published by simplfy3d here . This is especially true if we take into account the directional dependency of the material properties which is introduced by the FFF process. Out of plane strength, i.e. layer adhesion, suffers greatly for most materials. The overall knock down for PLA is relatively low.
von Kristian Zimmermann 05 Feb., 2020
The number of blasters that we have created and their derivatives is steadily increasing. I have hence decided to create a little overview, which you can find here . I will add more information over time, in an effort to answer as many questions as I can.
Weitere Beiträge
Share by: